NewsComments by webmaster Jon Kennedy
Search:
Keywords:
In Association with Amazon.com

Please let us know any ideas you have for how to improve the service.

 

October 2 2004 | Teddy Roosevelt quote in courthouse 'too Christian'; must be covered up

How sad that instead of defending freedom for all, cultural diversity through religious pluralism, the ADL prefers freedom for none in order to foist their secularist vision of what America should be on the rest of us.


October 1 2004 | Pennsylvania parents challenge state's home schooling requirements

It's not clear whether the state is requiring a specific curriculum or it's providing suggested ones. This case sounds difficult for the plaintiffs but bears close scrutiny.


September 30 2004 | Modern theatrical musicals said to be teaching churches religion

Is this getting things in reverse logic? I would have sworn that it was the churches that inspired the musical play (and its predecessor, the operetta) in the first place. That notwithstanding, there's something to be gained in reminding both the producers of musicals and the churches' ministries how much common ground they cover.


September 29 2004 | 'Religious hardball' will debut this Saturday in prime time on Pax-TV

Finally, Pax-TV begins to fulfill some of the promise I thought it showed when it first went on the air. I've seen some of Strobel's work and feel this shows strong potential.


September 28 2004 | Christianity Today studies would-be President John Kerry's 'open mind'

This is a succinct recapitulation of previously reported positions taken by John Kerry. Some evangelicals who feel some religious rootedness in the Democratic Party (as I did for much of my life) may take heart in their hero, Jim Wallis, saying, "I think the Democrats in the last few decades have been controlled by secular fundamentalists who are concerned about any religious or even moral talk." But, "That's changing. There's a big conversation going on in the party about this." Of course there's likely to be such talk going on where ever Wallis goes. What else are "secular fundamentalist Democrats" going to talk about around him? But anyone who follows the media is surely even more convinced that the secular fundamentalism and hatred of Christianity and its values is continuing to dominate and grow in the liberal side of the American political spectrum this year, as never before.


September 27 2004 | Dylan autobiography seems to leave the elusive genius still beyond touch

Being only a year younger than Bob Dylan and involved with youth journalism from age 15 to 40, I often marvelled at the adulation descibed in this piece, and wondered where it was rooted. Every new album in the period described was a new birth not only for Dylan, but his fans.

Other coverage of the autobiography describes it as exposing his own reaction to that as being as incredulous as mine or other less ardent fans who were also followers of the pop culture of the era. He seems to transcend being famous for being famous, but why and how remains as enigmatic as ever.


September 26 2004 | Author: Disney gospel has evolved, but never transcends 'secular toonism'

I wrote in my Message of the Movies some 30 years ago that the Disney "gospel" was dangerous to Christian faith. I was less clever than author Mark Pinsky, however, in labelling Disney's religion romanticism rather than "secular toonism." Such reomantic notions as finding your strength in yourself alone obviously mitigates having to turn to God for spiritual sustenance. This article is good food for thought as is, I would guess, the book it's highlighting.


September 25 2004 | Pro-abortion group asks IRS to revoke tax status of anti-abortion group

Of course the idea that political choices are not religious choices, whether chosen for the left or the right, is bogus at its root, and should be removed as a litmus test for charitable tax exemption. The left is using the IRS to impose its agenda on the rest of us, as fascists and other types of totalitarians or "unitaries" always try to do.


September 24 2004 | Catholic church calls sex-ed materials in Scotland schools 'pornography'

It's ironic, I think, that even in liberal societies where there is an established church, there is still a lack of social and moral guidance. No doubt it's about the triumph of secularism.


SBCGlobal, our Internet service provider, was out of service
September 21-23, delaying our updating of pages for those days.

September 23 2004 | Nationally, public school teachers twice as likely to choose private schools

Maybe they know something?


September 22 2004 | Jewish players' production ridicules evangelical Christian youth outreach 'hell houses'

Can you imagine if the shoe were on the other foot and that Christians were ridiculing a Jewish youth program?

Though the whimsical headline refers to "putting fun in fundamentalim," it's admitted to really be about making fun of Christian fundamentalists. Have you ever seen a more blatant claim that it's alright to perpretrate hatred toward American Christian "fundies" than some of the spokesmen for this play are giving?


September 21 2004 | Columnist's plea for 'fewer labels' misses the point of fair, accurate reporting

I believe I've found some of Tammeus' columns useful, but this strikes me as innane; nonsensical. Did he learn the "five w's" in journalism school—who, what, where, when, why? There's a reason these are needed in every report, and the more permutations of each of them—the more "labels"—in every report, the more informative the report will be, and the more understanding it will provide for the public, if the labels are fair and accurate. What's more annoying than to read that a church has celebrated a hundredth anniversary, or has been victimized by arson, or been sued by a disgruntled former parishioner, or broken ground for a new 10,000-seat sanctuary, with no mention of what its denomination or jurisdiction is, a problem in more and more "church news" stories these days?

It may take some digging, and some asking of questions to uncover the right "labels." And the same principle pertains to individuals. Let them describe themselves, let their positions and their works assist, but don't leave them unlabeled! What might you be trying to hide, and why?

As for the Rev. Tony Campolo's questions.... The point at which "evangelicals" or any other stripe of believers in the Judeo-Christian God became "anti-" anything is the point at which the Prophets of the Lord said, in Scripture, that God condemns self-aggrandizing "mesm," of the feminist or any other stripe, and gay or other destructive sexual practices. If Tammeus reads him to us properly, one has to wonder why Campolo doesn't just come out and ask, "when did evangelicals become anti-sin?" Or, considering the alliance that has made him most famous, "when did evangelicals become anti-abortion?" It should go without saying that if anyone is "anti-feminist person" or "anti-gay man or woman," that's not evangelical; it's sub-Christian. But neither is being silent about the sins besetting our cul\ture and being preached by those trying to destroy our culture evangelical or Christian. Labels seem to go both ways.

Talk about misuse of labels: Campolo's comparison of the Christian Coalition with the National Rifle Association while providing no support of particulars is a bit of a stretch, wouldn't you say, Mr. Tammeus? I walk on two feet most of the time, favor use of my right hand most of the time, and weigh too much, which mades me uncomfortably similar to all too many atheists and Communists. Or are you referring to other things members of the NRA and Christian Coalition have in common? And if so, what would those be? And if not, isn't this guilting by association? If you are not being paid by the word and already over your quota, why didn't you tell us? Why throw around your own unsupported "labels"?

And why in the world would you label Tony Campola an "evangelical leader"? Couldn't you have been a little more accurate, and fair to your readers?


September 20 2004 | Yet another look at Bush's religion calls it 'soft, loving' and not fundamentalist

The San Francisco Chronicle? First the Washington Post and now the San Francisco Chronicle features an article defending (at least from a liberal perspective) President Bush's religion? Could this be raising questions about flagging support of Kerry at some of the highest levels?


September 19 2004 | Washington Post study: Bush is openly religious, but [only] to a point

While showing that Bush takes his Christian profession more seriously (at least publicly) than Kerry, apparently he is not as bound by his evangelical commitment as his critics have been trying to argue. Methinks the main impact of this piece is that it shows Bush as more complicated than the transparent simpleton his critics love to believe he is. And that, considering the source, is rather amazing.


September 18 2004 | School disciplined Christian student for wearing shirt expressing 'prejudice'

Since when can any American interest group declare a "Day of Silence" to silence the objections of those who don't want to be silent? Again, your Democratic institutions and officials are out to curb your First Amendments guarantees of free speech and religion.


September 17 2004 | BBC, again, scrutinizes the role of religion in American political life

This is similar to yesterday's linked article from MSNBC, but without the frontal attacks on American Christians.

In my Postcard feature for yesterday I quoted Mohandas Ghandi to the effect that "Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." And I added that they don't know what politics is, either. And lest anyone misunderstand, of course I do not believe any authority of any religious institution should have any power over any political entity (unless he or she is elected--despite being a member of the clergy--to public office). But I also believe that the religion of Christianity and several other monotheistic religions are preferable to the "principles" of atheistic or agnostic humanism, which rules by default if Christians, Jews, Muslims are barred from bringing their scruples to the tasks of public justice.

On another issue from the linked article, I find it incredible that—or if—Pastor Ted Haggard of the New Life Church of Colorado would say, "let's say an unmarried boy and girl decide to have sex in their car as they're leaving the church parking lot. I don't believe the police officer directing traffic should be able to arrest them for that." If Colorado law allows sex in cars in public places, it's the only place I've heard of to be that far gone back toward our pagan roots! And I used to live in Hollywood! And if Pastor Haggard condones it or says it's no one's business, well, that's just astounding.


September 16 2004 | MSNBC series caricatures Christian faith to dissuade 'religious' voters

No one takes the Bible "literally"; this charge is always used by the enemies of those who try to take the Bible seriously as a guide to every facet of their lives. Who takes literally Jesus words, from the Bible, for example, "He who has two tunics, let him give to him who has none"? Taking it literally would mean one would not be permitted to own two coats because, even as Jesus himself says elsewhere, the poor are always with us; there are always more neighbors in need. We take it principially, seriously, and we interpret passages like this one as meaning we need to look out for our neighbors, be generous, find reasonable and real ways to meet needs, but no Christian community takes it to the "literal" extreme that would hold one can't have a warm-weather coat and a cold-weather coat. Remember, only the enemies (virtually, there are always kook fringes) of the Bible and Bible-believing use the term "literally" this way.

Likewise, no reasonable person sees everything in black and white terms. Who sees more "grey" in America's posture vis a vis Saudi Arabia, for example, than the President and his administration. This distortion, too, is a red herring the enemies of Christianity throw out to dissuade belief or taking seriously the claims of Christianity. Some fundamentalists have black and white views of Israel, perhaps (I think even Pat Robertson, not near the extreme wing of the evangelical spectrum, is too one-sided on American-Israel policy). But here, too, the administration's policies are always shaded a multihued spectrum of greys. In general, Israel is our best friend in that part of the world. But it doesn't have the right to do everything it wants to do, even to Yasser Arafat, its prime nemesis in the district.

Some issues are black and white. Some issues are clearly pitting righteousness against evil. But most are not, not even in the thinking of the most hidebound fundamentalists, and certainly not in a man like George W. Bush.

Only an idiot would hold the positions MSNBC decribes on Scripture and on seeing everything in black and white. And only an idiotic news organization would expect Americans to be taken in by such deceptive, straw-man "reporting."

We should be raging against CBS News for its outrageously one-sided, biased and false reporting on the current political scene, but we should not miss what NBC News is trying to do to us, either.

Can I get an Amen?


September 15 2004 | Previewers say PBS' 'Question of God' series treats Christian views fairly

As usual, Chuck Colson says it best: Watch.

Check this web page for the program time in your area. Enter your zip code to find PBS stations in your area.

Here's the PBS webpage for the program.


September 14 2004 | Pope again stresses the distinction between marriage and civil cohabitation

The human tendency is to move on to "normalizing" widespread practice rather than continuing to oppose and reform it. But I must agree with the New Zealand bishop who described such accommodations as barbarian in their effect. Literally, accommodations to antinormative patterns are moving back away from societies based on Christian and humane values to those that prevailed in pagan pre-Christian Europe.


September 13 2004 | Gay and transsexual students, only, may apply for these college scholarships

Catch 23 perhaps: How does one prove he or she is a gay man or lesbian to qualify for these funds?

How do high school guidance counselors know who to recommend these scholarships to? Would doing such a recommendation sometimes present a terrible challenge to high school students, or constitute "sexualizing" underage teenagers (considering it's usually 17-year-olds who are sorting out their college plans)? And if the "gay" scholar later marries a member of the opposite sex, does he or she have to give back the money, or the degree?


September 12 2004 | Colorado Democrats attack policy meant to protect Conservative speech

Yet another liberal stance on freedom of speech but only their speech or speech that reflects their prejudices.


September 11 2004 | New book hailed as 'a bold manifesto for the Christian worldview'

Even before the linked article came to my attention, I had heard good reports about this book. Though I haven't had a chance to read it, it's obvious that it promotes principles and principals that have long been dear to my heart. In my campus ministry years, I was widely used to expound and expand on the works of Francis Schaeffer and my graduate thesis (published as The Reformation of Journalism) was on the application of a Christian worldview to the mass media enterprise, based on the thinking of "reformational" scholars like Abraham Kuyper and his second- and third-generation descendants. I hope to read it soon and am linking it on Amazon for the convenience of our readers.


September 10 2004 | A firestorm erupts over Serbian schools minister's anti-Darwin stance

This would be howlingly funny if it weren't so serious.

Already the Associated Press is saying "some religious people" believe God created human beings...and the scientists and journalists are proposing that Darwinian theory is not scientific dogma?

Is it time for another US invasion of Serbia, this time targeting public schools rather than ancient monasteries? No doubt the scientific establishment would welcome such.

My vote, however, is for Education Minister Ljiljana Colic, and for at least pluralism of cultural ideals in educational systems. What kind of "rationalism" and "science" demands totalitarisnism in children's schools?

Leave it to the American press to quote the only spokesman of Serbia's religious establishment it could find as warning against anti-Darwinism and still interpreting the education minister's stance as an instance of church interference with the secular state.


September 9 2004 | Media biggie accused of going anti-Bush to reassert the 'right'...to smoke

We all have our priorities.

Toby Young doesn't comment on the fact that on the national level and in California (where antismoking laws are most "progressive") it has been Democrats, not Bush-type Republicans who've led the crusade. Still...there's been stranger developments in the world of politics.


September 8 2004 | Antiochian Christians launch museum to promote Mid-East understanding

The Antiochian Orthodox Prelate is based in Syria, a nation that many Americans, including political leaders, consider a state that supports and harbors Muslim terrorists. The Antiochians defend the Syrian government as supportive of its Christian minorities. Others say that all Muslim governments require all minorities to pledge and demonstrate loyalty to their Muslim system in order to have any autonomy within their borders. Can Gibran (who was Orthodox) unravel the tricky knot? Probably not, but the museum is a worthy effort in that direction.


WE WERE ON VACATION SEPTEMBER 2-7.

September 2-7 2004 | Jewish author says on an Islamic website that French secularism must reform

So-called Enlightenment France is the crucible of modernism, which includes the idea of a unitary "mono" cultural state, as Benbassa calls it. Such "mono" statehood —aka fascism—is inimical to Christian principles of living in peace with all people and republican pluralist cultural ideals.


September 1 2004 | Letter from a Reuters editor suggests that the unborn threaten civilization

And ergo, it would seem, Eastham must think abortion is one of the most civilized things humanity has ever come up with?

Will the major media follow their own earlier lead in reporting on the scandals involving the reporting of the New York Times' Jayson Blair and USA Today's Jack Kelley cases and out this purveyor of hate and death?

I'm not holding my breath.

Click here for the previous month's NewsComment

Bible search in Bible Gateway
 
 Version:  
Passage:  (e.g., John 4)
Word(s):  (e.g. God  loves)
    
 
Search the worldwide web and Xnmp via
 
Google
 

Search Xnmp.com
Search WWW
Find a word


in Merriam-Webster's online dictionary

 
 
Free JavaScripts provided by The JavaScript Source