| Previous
month's edition | NOVEMBER 2006 |
| Reduced
coverage. I'm in a book project and not able to update daily. Please check
in often to see what's happening. jon | Wednesday,
November 29 2006 | A
Jewish writer urges Christians to stand up against efforts to secularize Christmas
| | Stephen
Franks: "I am Jewish.
At the same time I am not embarrassed, ashamed or resentful when someone wishes
me a "Merry Christmas". Instead, I am pleased with the fact that folks remember
the origin of December 25, rather than the presents. A greeting of Merry Christmas
is a sign of happiness, the true reason for the holiday and a way to show religious
freedom. When stores and communities have the Menorah or a Manger scene, it shows
the diversity and tolerance of our nation. Yet, when stores, schools and communities
declare a "Seasons Greetings" or a "Holiday Sale" I cringe. The season is a religious
one. The "Sale" is using a religious occasion for selling commercial products."
| | | | Of
course Christians should not resent any individual who feels more comfortable
saying "happy holiday" (especially when it's just any day between Thanksgiving
and New Years). Their goodwill should be graciously acceptred and reflected back. | |
Sunday,
November 26 2006 | New
Episcopal presiding bishop shows the paucity of Christianity in the 'Christian
left'
| | Michael
Medved via Town Hall:
"The questions and answers with Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori eloquently (if
inadvertently) demonstrate the bankruptcy of the Religious Left. If the movement’s
attitudes toward marriage and child-bearing reflect the trendy ideas of secular
environmen-talists rather than timeless Biblical truth, then who needs religion?
Most Americans understand that the purpose of organized faith is to bring unchanging
values to bear in challenging and modifying the fads and temptations of the moment.
Religion means nothing if we rather begin with fashionable contemporary ideas
and use them to alter the fundamentals of faith. Moreover, what’s the point of
maintaining any sort of organized Christianity if one of its most prominent leaders
will instinctively condemn her own faith tradition while excusing or dismissing
the violent excesses of the deadly Muslim enemies of the Christian world?" |
| | | Thanks
to Stephen Franks for bringing this article to my attention. Medved, as usual,
says all that's needed. | | Thursday,
November 23 2006 | Reduced
coverage next four months Happy
Thanksgiving! Because
of a book project, I'm in a reduced coverage mode from early November until some
time in March (Lord willing). Your prayers for a timely and inspiring finish are
greatly appreciated. On
a roll: I'm in Chapter 4 of the Everything C. S. Lewis and Narnia Book.
Thanks for the prayers. Monday,
November 20 2006 | Challenge
to Catholic pastors: compete with megachurches offering free Starbucks' coffee
and Krispy Kreme
| | Syndicated
columnist Terry Mattingly:
"Father John A. Valencheck of the Diocese of Cleveland...received a postcardaddressed
'Occupant' from a megachurch promoting its free Starbucks coffee and Krispy
Kreme Donuts. It's hard for Catholics to compete in this marketplace, he noted
in an essay entitled, 'Mass Marketing Mass' in the Adoremus Bulletin. The ultimate
temptation is for priests to embrace the 'bedrock assumption that the Mass is
a painful event' and that they need to make major changes in order to survive.
'One solution is to make the Mass pass as quickly as possible, apparently on the
assumption that the people who are there do not want to be there....'" |
| | | Mass
marketing indeed. | | Sunday,
November 19 2006 | Elton
John 'represents a growing trend in the western world'
| | Columnist
Michael Coren in Toronto Sun:
"So should we care what Elton says about anything? Not really. Problem is,
he speaks for and represents a growing trend in the western world. In a culture
where pop stars and afternoon television presenters shape opinion, good old Elton
has a great deal of influence." | | | | What
always amazes me when we run items like this and the one Coren is referring to
(see November 12) how many people don't "get it." "So what?"
They say. Why give a crackpot like Elton any notice? Why discuss "postmodernism"
if the definition is not even clear? Coren nails it. | |
Saturday,
November 18 2006 | Reduced
coverage next four months Because
of a book project, I'm in a reduced coverage mode from early November until some
time in March (Lord willing). Your prayers for a timely and inspiring finish are
greatly appreciated. Special
bonus today: Please check out the news coverage of my current book in my hometown
paper, in Judy Rose's "Postcard." Friday,
November 17 2006 | Professor
disciplined for punishing Christian student who refused to lobby for homosexual
adoption
| | John-Henry
Westen in LifeSite: "Emily
Brooker, a student in the Missouri State University's School of Social Work, sued
the university after being punished by a professor for refusing to lobby in favour
of homosexual adoption. Only weeks after launching the suit, the university has
settled out of court and disciplined the professor in question. Professor Frank
Kauffman had assigned Brooker, and her classmates, to write a letter to the Missouri
Legislature expressing support for homosexual adoption. She refused to do so because
of her religious objections and was charged with a 'Level 3 Grievance,' the most
serious charge possible, and faced the possibility of having her degree withheld
" | | | | This
follows up on our November 2 post. | |
Thursday,
November 16 2006 | Paper
says 'three Christian groups move to condemn gay sex'
| | By
Alan Cooperman and Peter Whoriskey, Washington Post: "The
growing acceptance of gays in popular culture and the fact that homosex-uality
has powerful advocacy groups made the stance necessary, Baptist leaders said.
'In our day and time, no other sin marches so defiantly across our national landscape,'
Mark Harris, the head of the committee that introduced the measure, told the 2,600
delegates, or 'messengers,' assembled at a convention hall in Greensboro, N.C."
| |
In general, this report seems beneath the professional
standards the Washington Post is known for. Anyone who watches the current
scene in religion knows the Catholic Church and Southern Baptists have always
officially condemned same-sex activity and for years the largest of the Presbyterian
denominations (the one mentioned here) has been clamoring to find ways to accommodate
it, but there is no hint of this here.Believe me (speaking as a former Presbyterian),
the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) is not likely to condemn anything other than
conservative Christianity. There's not even a mention here
that the North Carolina Baptists are Southern Baptists. Of course any savvy person
knows this, but this newspaper is published in Washington, D.C. Wednesday,
November 15 2006 | Holy
Hollywood: Newsweek headlines Hollywood's discovery of religious market
| | "'The
Nativity Story,' a new movie that tells the narrative of the birth of Jesus Christ,
won’t be in theaters until December, but Anne Graham Lotz has already seen it.
Lotz, who is Billy Graham’s daughter, was one of the dozens of pastors, religious
scholars and historians who were consulted on the script. Still, she says, she
was nervous when the studio, New Line, brought the film to North Carolina to screen
it for her. 'I’d never really had any communication with Hollywood before this,
and my impression is that Hollywood doesn’t quite get it when it comes to Christians,'
she says. 'So I was very concerned about showing the movie to people before I’d
seen it. I just didn’t know what the finished product would be.' As the final
credits rolled and the lights came up, she had her answer. 'I’m not an emotional
person,' she says, 'but when I finished watching it I … it was just over-whelming
to me, the tenderness and beauty of it. The tears came down my cheeks. I couldn’t
speak.'" | |
Pennance for The Last Temptation of Christ,
The Da Vinci Code and their ilk...? Tuesday,
November 14 2006 | Groking
postmodernism An Xnmp special essay I
was discussing postmodernism with a philosophically inclined graduate student
after church on Sunday and the upshot of our discussion was that the term is still
not well enough defined to get a handle on. Later, I looked up some pages online
discussing it, but the pages' definitions disagree so widely that the sum of those
definitions reaffirmed what we'd tentatively concluded: Though obviously suggesting
that modernism is passé, otherwise postmodernism means whatever anyone using it
wants it to mean. But several of the pages at least attempt
to pinpoint the origin of the postmodern philosophical state of mind, and these
seem more helpful than others that attempt to squeeze it into a definition of
current trends in art, music, psychology, or sociology. Here's an excerpt from
a paragraph that I think
is on the right track: For a short period in 1968,
there seemed a strong possibility that major political changes could take place
throughout the Western world as a result of action by students, trade unionists,
anti-Vietnam war protesters, liberal Communists and militant Socialists. This
was not to be and in France where the struggle was arguably the most intense,
this led to a waning of the huge influence previously wielded by the large Communist
Party….
This line of thought was seconded by another
page that a member of my Nanty Glo list
sent to us several months ago, a page that was more pointedly Marxist than the
one quoted. But taking this through my own grinder, I thought I was receiving
a beginning flicker of what postmodernism should be used to mean. Modernism
(defined as the sine qua non of Enlightenment
thinking) was all about creating an enlightened or scientifically qualified society
that would move toward utopia. Modernism in religion and education were intended
to replace the biblical monotheistic conception of Creator-God and human fall
and redemption, finding god in the community, the church and school. And as the
new god, these communities would create the new society. Though through the 19th
century and over half of the 20th this quest was pursued quite seriously by education
theorists like John Dewey and religionists like the higher
critics in theology, its rational extreme came through Marx and Engels and
the Russian Revolution. Marx's analysis insisted that progress toward a utopian
society would succeed only after it threw off the shackles of superstition (any
vestiges of religion), resulting in his followers' concluding that only atheism
was acceptable for citizens ("comrades") engaged in the quest for the new society. Western
Progressives watched the Russian experiment with hopeful approval for some decades
after the revolution, but most were eventually disillusioned (see The
God That Failed, 1949). But after Stalin
(died 1953), Russian Communism gradually gained new support from Western Progressives,
along with rising hopes that eventually the "dictatorship of the Proletariat"
advocated by Marx might end in a new era of enlightened social democracy. Fast
forward to 1968, the war in Vietnam and the student uprisings through much of
the West, the sexual revolution and the rise of the drug culture, and Progressive
optimism may have peaked. The fabric of Christian hegemony in the West was in
tatters at last, creating a vacuum that Progressives could readily fill. But their
hopes plummeted when the revolution not only failed to occur but was undermined
by Gorbachev's tacit admission that Marxist strategies and dreams had failed in
Russia, Solzhenitsyn's conversion back to his childhood Orthodoxy and his world-shaking
books affirming that Christ is the world's best hope, and not long afterward the
dismantling of socialism in England by Margaret Thatcher and the first steps toward
dismantling the welfare state in the United States by Ronald Reagan. All
hope was gone for savvy, realistic Progressives (though, of course, it is still
very much alive in both England's Liberal Party and America's Democratic Party).
So…the pop journalist critics' use of postmodernism to describe the generation
of "eat, drink, have sex, and make merry for tomorrow we die" are on the right
track. Modernism having failed, postmodernism has nothing left except to do whatever
each liberated, enlightened Progressive thinks right, expedient, or fun in his
or her own sight. I welcome input both critical and supportive.
I doubt that I've finally "nailed" postmodernism, but at least this rings true
to my own ears.
Monday,
November 13 2006 | Retailers
rediscover 'Merry Christmas'
| | Detroit
News: "'Merry
Christmas' is making a comeback. Wal-Mart this week joined a growing number of
retailers who are once again using 'Christmas' in their holiday advertising campaigns.
America's largest retailer took the word out of its advertisements last year,
but is bringing it back after a massive public outcry, which included 700,000
people signing petitions. Wishing for a bigger holiday season after a sluggish
fall, the chain said Thursday that 60 percent more of its merchandise will be
labeled with 'Christmas' this year. And customers will hear Christmas carols as
they shop. Kohl's Corp. and Walgreen Co. also are putting the word Christmas back
in their advertisements. Macy's, after using the more inclusive 'Happy Holidays'
in its ads and in-store promotions in 2004, resumed the use of 'Merry Christmas'
last year and will continue." | |
I've written in the
past about the "war on Christmas" (as one author called it last year).
I believe it is real and continues being waged by those who think everything "religious"
in our culture is negative (see Sir Elton John's statements in yesterday's post,
and the three "scientists" cited the day before, for examples). Sunday,
November 12 2006 | Sir
Elton John calls for a ban of religion 'for the sake of gays'
| | Irish
Examiner: "Sir
Elton said: 'I think religion has always tried to turn hatred towards gay people.
Religion promotes the hatred and spite against gays. But there are so many people
I know who are gay and love their religion. From my point of view I would ban
religion completely. Organised religion doesn't seem to work. It turns people
into really hateful lemmings and it's not really compassionate.' He added: 'The
world is near escalating to World War Three and where are the leaders of each
religion? Why aren't they having a conclave? Why aren't they coming together?'"
| |
Did someone say "agenda"? Here it is,
folks, plain as the nose on your face. And who is a more credible spokemodel for
the whole gay movement than Sir Elton John? Saturday,
November 11 2006 | Three
scientists' books aim to shoot down any gospel other than science
| | Robert
Lee Hotz in Los Angles Times: "What
a problem religious faith poses for learned men of empirical mind. How it baffles,
angers, frightens them, prompts them to domesticate it or uproot it, leaf and
bough. In a trio of new books, three scientists — an English evolutionary theorist,
a bestselling philosopher-turned-neuroscientist and a Pulitzer Prize-winning biologist
— take Christianity to task. Their works comprise a new testament for atheists,
in which science is the only acceptable gospel." |
| The link
to the Los Angeles Times book review was open when this was published,
but usually the LAT requires registration. In case the article is no longer available
when you try it, the books in question are The God Delusion by Richard
Dawkins; Letter to a Christian Nation by Sam Harris, and The Creation:
An Appeal to Save Life on Earth by E.O. Wilson. Friday,
November 10 2006 | Reduced
coverage next four months Because
of a book project, I'm in a reduced coverage mode from early November until some
time in March (Lord willing). Your prayers for a timely and inspiring finish are
greatly appreciated. Thursday,
November 9 2006 | Benedict
XVI: People are made just in God's eyes and saved by Jesus' 'pure grace, an unmerited
gift of God'
| | Carol
Glatz, Catholic News Service: "with
Christ, the apostle Paul came to understand the importance of self-giving and
that his life should be dedicated to living for Christ, not for an improved form
of himself. St. Paul said how people are made just in God's eyes and saved by
Jesus is 'pure grace, an unmerited gift of God's radical love' and is not dependent
on performing good works, the pope said. To be justified means to be embraced
by 'God's merciful justice and to enter in communion with him and, as a consequence,
to be able to establish a much more authentic relationship with all our brothers
and sisters,' he said. The pope said St. Paul's writings help define Christian
identity as being about 'receiving Christ and giving oneself to Christ,' not about
searching for oneself." | | | | And
some wondered where the next Billy Graham would come
from. | | Wednesday,
November 8 2006 | Colson:
Christians must never desire the luxury of 'fasting from politics'
| | In
Townhall.com: "David
Kuo is right [in Tempting Faith] about one thing: Christians involved in
politics must maintain their independence; without that, we play into the hands
of those — Republicans and Democrats — who would use us. Both parties are doing
and saying things to attract so-called values voters. And I say good: I'd like
to see Republicans and Democrats work to protect innocent human life at every
stage, stop AIDS, end the destruction of the family, and take care of prisoners
and the poor. But Kuo is dead wrong to suggest that that Christians ought to enter
into a time of 'fasting' from politics. These words, which I wrote in 1987, that
so influenced David are true today: 'Christians need to influence politics for
justice and righteousness.' But we must do so 'with eyes open, aware of the snares
. . . Today Christians may find themselves suspect — I have experienced this myself
— to the very people on whose side they are fighting. But that is the price they
must pay to preserve their independence and not be beholden to any political ideological
alignment.' That's what I wrote in 1987; that's what I mean today." |
| The day
after is a good time for such a reminder.
Tuesday,
November 7 2006 | Terry
Mattingly: 'Hypocrites are us'
| | Syndicated
column: "'It's hard
to talk about the Foley story without talking about hypocrisy,' said journalist
Jeremy Lott, referring to the congressman's spectacular fall after discovery of
his explicit digital messages to teen-aged male Capitol pages. 'I mean, Mark Foley's
a hypocrite, the Republicans are hypocrites, the Democrats are hypocrites and
lots of journalists are hypocrites, too. Right now, I can't think of anyone in
the Foley affair who isn't being accused of being a hypocrite by somebody and
lots of the anti-hypocrites are being hypocritical, too.'" |
| | | Timely,
but nary a mention of Ted Haggard. Thanks for giving it a break. | |
Monday,
November 6 2006 | Standing-room-only
at Colorado Springs' New Life Church after pastor's firing
| | Carol
McGraw and Paul Asay in The State: "The
sanctuary was full at New Life Church as congregants gathered for their first
Sunday service without the leadership of the beloved Haggard. Haggard was fired
Saturday by the church's Board of Overseers, who cited the pastor's 'sexual immoral
conduct.' The mood was a mixture of sadness and determination that the church
will go on. The service was rife with tears, hugging, anger and calls for forgiveness.
The congregation stood and applauded for acting senior pastor Ross Parsley, for
the overseers, and for a letter written by Gayle Haggard, but not for the confession
submitted by beleaguered pastor Ted Haggard. Haggard will seek intensive mental
and spiritual counseling from nationally-prominent pastors Jack Hayford and Tommy
Barnett and Focus on the Family Chairman James Dobson. The Rev. Larry Stockstill,
head of the oversight board, said: 'Today you're seeing both the goodness and
the justice of God. We can be mad at God, say that it's not fair, the timing is
terrible, or we can say "blessed be the name of the Lord."'" |
| I've never run three stories on
the same development in succession here before, but of the available stories for
today, this was the best. And it is worth reading. Sunday,
November 5 2006 | Liberals
fear Haggard's fall could galvanize conservative voters in his Congressional District
| | AP's
Judith Kohler via SFGATE: "Experts
agree the Rev. Ted Haggard's fall from grace is bound to have political repercussions
— but say it might help, not hinder, Colorado Republicans and their causes....For
instance, Vice President Dick Cheney visited Colorado Springs on Friday to cam-paign
for Doug Lamborn, who is running a tight race against Democrat Jay Fawcett for
a seat in Haggard's reliably Republican district. Rep. Joel Hefley is retiring....Religious
conservatives, outraged by the way the accusations were made, could give Lamborn
the edge he needs in his battle with Fawcett, a former Air Force officer trying
to become the first Democrat to win the seat, Loevy said." |
| Sounds contrived or paranoid to me, but on a day
when the only religion pertaining to our Xnmp issues seemed to be reports on the
affair Haggard, this was the most noteworthy. See blog for some comments
on the larger meaning of Haggard's fall. Saturday,
November 4 2006 | Evangelical
leader resigns after being accused by 'gay' prostitute | Admits
some charges are true
| | Collin
Hansen in Christianity Today: "Ted
Haggard resigned Thursday afternoon as president of the National Association of
Evangelicals, amid allegations that surfaced Wednesday about involvement with
a male prostitute. Haggard also placed himself on administrative leave as senior
pastor of New Life Church in Colorado Springs, pending a church investigation." Ted
Olsen, Christianity Today: "In an e-mail to staff members
of New Life Church, acting senior pastor Ross Parsley says that some of the accusa-tions
against Ted Haggard are true. 'The board of overseers has met with Pastor Ted,'
Parsley wrote. 'It is important for you to know that he confessed to the overseers
that some of the accusations against him are true. He has willingly and humbly
submitted to the authority of the board of overseers, and will remain on administrative
leave during the course of the investigation.'" |
| If the Democrats regain control of Congress next
week, pundits will wonder whether the "Foley affair," Jon Stewart's
week of broadcasting from Ohio, or the charges against a major evangelical and
"Christian right" minister will be remembered as the main factor. Somewhere
in there is discouraging news on Iraq, too, I suppose. Friday,
November 3 2006 | Reporter
expresses the confusion many share about 'legislating morality'
| | Brian
Gray via the Timesplus: "In
Matthew 28:18-20, Jesus told his disciples, "All authority has been given to me
in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing
them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching
them to observe all things that I have commanded you, and lo, I am with you always,
even unto the end of the earth." Nowhere, and this may come as a surprise and
a shock to some of my fellow Christians who view religion and politics as the
same thing, did he tell his disciples to legislate their beliefs." |
| It's true that in a Roman Empire controlled by
pagans, Jesus didn't advocate insurrection, which is what it would have taken
to "reform" the debauched society into which He was born, the one imposing
its rule and oppressing His Jewish province. It may be true that we are not called
to legislate our morals, but in the current case, not voting for the preservation
of the ancient and venerable definition of marriagea morality that even
the Romans at least legally (if not whole-heartedly) supported and as marriage
has been held in all civilizationswould be to legislate the "morality"
of people who want fornication as our culture's dominant lifestyle. Their
goal is to turn our culture into a "laughingstock among the nations."
It is obvious from a reading of the whole Bible that God's law is true for all
people, in all times, and that fornication of any type, including "gay marriage"
(a gloss on licensed sodomy) is destructive of human persons and opposed to redemption.
Certainly, in democracies, Jesus is not expecting His people to abandon Him and
His law-for-creation when they go into their voting booths and cast their ballots.
I wonder if Brian Gray thinks being a Christian is a Sunday thing; the other six
days belonging to the son of perdition and the lusts of the flesh. Thursday,
November 2 2006 | Student
suit claims university required her to support homosexual adoption
| | Associated
Press via WTAE: "A
Christian student has filed a federal lawsuit accusing Missouri State University
of violating her constitutional rights. Emily Brooker said a professor required
students to write and sign letters urging the Missouri Legislature to approve
homosexual adoption and foster parenting. When she refused, arguing that to do
so would violate her religious beliefs, Brooker said she was accused of an insufficient
commitment to diversity and was brought before an ethics committee that asked
if she viewed gays and lesbians as sinners." |
| I have taught many college courses, all centered
on writing, and can't imagine requiring any student to express any opinion that
wasn't held and volunteered. How could any educated American feel otherwise about
that? Wednesday,
November 1 2006 | Christian
conservative ties to GOP described as strained, 'not broken'
| | AP's
Rachel Zoll in USA Today: "'There's
a lot of discontentment,' said Marvin Olasky, editor of the Christian newsweekly
World and a framer of the 'compassionate conservative' language used by
Bush. 'But unfortun-ately for most conservative evangelicals, there's no alternative.'
That does not mean the Republicans can rest easy. Damage over the past two years
could cost Republicans on Nov. 7 if disenchanted evangelical voters stay home.
And tensions with a core constituency would muddy the run-up to the 2008 presidential
race. In the Nov. 7 election, control of Congress is at stake with all 435 House
seats and 33 of the 100 Senate seats up for grabs. Voters will also elect 36 governors.
Democrats can take a majority in the House with 15 more seats, and in the Senate
with six more." | |
My take is that the general issue American Christian wants something better than
our current Congress and administration, so they tell the pollsters they're leaning
away from the current party in power. But then they look at the liberal party
and realize there's only one choice. The GOP may lose, as seems eventually to
be inevitable, but if so it will probably be by a closer margin than any poll
is predicting. |