Tuesday,
October 31 2006 | Halloween
special: Mattingly on how zombie movies may reflect classical Christian themes
| | On
Religion: "The movie
[Dawn of the Dead] was sickening, disturbing, funny and hauntingall
at the same time. Paffenroth was hooked, especially by Romero's bleak, biting
view of humanity's future. This wasn't just another commercial horror movie, the
kind that cable-television channels play around the clock at Halloween. Then a
strange thing happened in college, when Paffenroth's work in the classics led
him to St. Augustine, St. Thomas Aquinas and, especially, the medieval poet Dante
Alighieri. To his shock, he found that his doctoral work at Notre Dame University
was starting to overlap with his fascination with zombie movies. Suddenly, the
word 'Inferno' had new meaning. He decided that Romero's zombiesthe living
dead who had lost all self-control and reasonwere a modernized, bumbling,
cannibalistic vision of what Dante called the 'suffering race of souls who lost
the good of intellect.'" | |
Scripps Howard News Service
religion writer (and Orthodox Christian) Terry Mattingly often comes up with fresh
information on timely topics. This one strikes me of one of the best examples
of that. Monday,
October 30 2006 | Evangelicals
seen as 'rehabilitating' Halloween after an era of, mainly, simple opposition
| | Christian
Science Monitor: "Halloween,
long associated with pagan traditions, is now high season for an old American
tradition of evangelizing through tracts. The nation's four major publishers of
tracts say they sell more at Halloween than at any other time of year, including
Christmas and Easter. And the push is on to grow the seasonal market. This year,
thanks to new glow-in-the-dark tracts, the Texas-based American Tract Society
expects to set a new Halloween record by shipping out more than 4 million tracts.
Buoying tract sales, observers say, is a rising tide of evangelical passion for
Halloween rituals. Four years ago in Frisco, Texas, for instance, most churches
either shunned the holiday as a perceived festival of mischief or staged their
own alternative event. This year, at least 11 congregations are equipping members
with tracts for doorbell-answering adults and trick-or-treating kids to hand out.
'It's the only time of the year when people come to your door and ask to interact
with you,' says Wayne Braudrich, senior pastor at Frisco Bible Church, which offers
tracts to members for Halloween distribution. 'That just seems like a chance that
shouldn't be missed.'" | |
I find it interesting that
the writer omits the influence of C. S. Lewis and the Chronicles of Narnia
on this change in evangelical sensibilities. My guess is that last year's feature
film of The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe had more to do with it than
any of the speculations in the linked article. Sunday,
October 29 2006 | Movement
for parents to remove their children from state schools growing among Baptists
| | Agape
Press: "Resolutions
supporting an exit strategy from public schools have been submitted in every Southern
Baptist Convention (SBC) state and regional convention in the continental United
States. The resolution is based on a recommendation by Southern Baptist Theological
Seminary president Albert Mohler. Mohler wrote in an article that because of the
spiritual, moral, and academic decay that increasingly characterizes U.S. public
schools, Southern Baptists should develop a plan for taking their children out
of government schools. Roger Moran, a member of the SBC Executive Committee, helped
draft the resolution based on the seminary president's suggestions. Moran says
Christian parents must recognize that they are responsible for planning and overseeing
their children's education. 'We will be held accountable, and we have just shrugged
our shoulders as though it doesn't matter,' he asserts; 'but it does matter, and
it matters supremely.' The SBC official believes an exodus from government schools
is indicated because of the moral, social, and intellectual dangers prevalent
in public education...." | |
Not to mention the anti-Chrfistian
philosophy of education undergirding the so-called public schools? That omission
notwithstanding, this is a very important development, coming at last in the denomination
that is, by far, the largest one in American Protestantism. It's impossible to
get serious about discipleship to Jesus Christ without becoming aware of the principle
that all areas of life are to be brought under His dominion, and that cannot be
done in the lives of children being schooled in institutions which are, at their
base, in opposition to the Gospel and the Gospel's Lord. Saturday,
October 28 2006 | Candidate
for election in Quebec is a pro-gay-marriage, pro-abortion Catholic priest
| | Macleans.ca:
The Rev. Raymond "Gravel
gave up [gay] prostitution after being so severely beaten by a client that he
ended up in hospital. His tenure as a priest has not been low-key either. An outspoken
advocate, Gravel has publicly decried the Roman Catholic Church's position on
same-sex marriage. He has also received a disciplinary letter from Joseph Cardinal
Ratzinger before he became Pope Benedict XIV. Gravel was also one of 19 priests
who created a tempest in February when they signed an open letter criticizing
the church's position on same-sex marriage and its opposition to ordaining gays.
'I would say that 50 per cent of the priests in Quebec are gay but if I became
a priest, it's because I'm a believer and I believe in the message of Christ,'
he said in an interview last year with Fugues, a gay magazine. Gravel has
also been vocal about abortion rights and has said he will fight for justice in
Parliament." | |
I chose the linked article just because I found
it astounding. Not is Gravel heretical in any orthodex reading of the Bible and
the church, on holiness and separation from evil, he strikes me as patently unethical
for staying in, and trying to undermine, an institution that gives him support
spiritually and, presumably, physically. Why would anyone do this? How can anyone
claim to love the church and be working to destroy what Christ came to provide
(emancipation from our sins and the lusts of the flesh)? Friday,
October 27 2006 | Latest
'conservative' attack on Christians borders on signalling a trend
| | Josh
Treviño in The Remedy: "Heather Mac Donald, in USA Today, declares
that conservatism does not need God. ...First among Mac Donald's errors is her
implicit contention that reason and revelation are exclusive, opposed, or antagonistic.
It's a common mistake among the professionally irreligious, for whom religion
exists only as parody -- see the hateful Richard Dawkins, whom Mac Donald mercifully
does not at all resemble. One supposes that Mac Donald is utterly unfamiliar with
the Papal remarks at Regensburg (and the accompanying Muslim furor), which discussed
the very need for the concurrence of reason and faith; to say nothing of the work
of Thomas Aquinas and the Scholastics; and to say nothing of the martyrdom of
Thomas More. That's merely drawing from the Catholic tradition: Protestantism
has its own rich tradition of rationalism informing faith, and vice-versa. The
faith-and-reason topic is well-trodden ground, and it's a pity that Mac Donald
chooses to mischaracterize it with an invocation of inherent opposition between
the two." |
| Add Mac
Donald's "internal criticism" to Andrew Sullivan's recent book (The
Conservative Soul), and Kevin Phillips' treasonous (to conservativism) American
Theocracy, and you might say there's a small-scale uprising in conservative
circles against its major voting block, the so-called Christian Right. I hadn't
read Treviño before, but he makes a good case against Mac Donald's silly
sophistry. Thursday,
October 26 2006 | Feminist
egalitarianism called a new 'path to liberalism' within evangelicalism
| | Albert
Mohler in Christian Post: "In
Evangelical Feminism, published by Crossway Books, [Wayne] Grudem argues
that evangelical feminism now represents one of the greatest dangers to the continued
orthodoxy of the evangelical movement. 'I am concerned that evangelical feminism
(also known as 'egalitarianism') has become a new path by which evangelicals are
being drawn into theological liberalism,' he explains. In this new book, Grudem
considers 25 different patterns of argument put forth by evangelical feminists,
and demonstrates that every single one of them either contra-dicts or compromises
the authority of Scripture.
"...Grudem's use of the term 'theological liberalism' is certain to be controversial.
After all, the very genesis of the evangelical movement in North America was grounded
in an effort to avoid the errors of theological modernism and liberalism that
had already by the midpoint of the last century overtaken the mainline Protestant
denominations. Grudem defines theological liberalism as 'a system of thinking
that denies the complete truthfulness of the Bible as the Word of God and denies
the unique and absolute authority of the Bible in our lives.' In defining evangelicalism
over against theological liberalism in this way, Grudem returns to the Scripture
Principle that stood as foundational to the evangelical movement." |
| Adding
this "egalitarianism"
to the "emerging
church" movement and "process
theology," one has to wonder if evangelicalism, at fifty years after the founding
of its defining medium, Christianity Today, is an endangered entity. Wednesday,
October 25 2006 | University
of Notre Dame leaders reflect on Harvard's proposal to study faith and reason
| | The
Rev. John I. Jenkins, president, and Thomas Burish, provost of the University
of Notre Dame, via St. Paul Pioneer Press: "What
should a properly educated college graduate of the early 21st century know? A
Harvard curriculum committee proposed an answer to that question this month, stating
that, among other things, such a graduate should know 'the role of religion in
contemporary, historical or future events — personal, cultural, national or international.'
...Harvard is the drum major of American higher education: Where it leads, others
follow. And if Harvard says taking a course in religion is necessary to be an
educated person, it's a good bet that many other colleges and universities will
soon make the same discovery. We hope they will.'" |
| It's always
surprising to meet people who think religion has nothing to do with reason, but
they are out there in droves, abetted in part by the irrational "leap" tradition
in some circles which implies that thinking or research may be dangerous to faith.
So it's important to mention now and then that there has always been an emphasis
on the rational defense of the faith, from Old Testament times through the New
Testament to the 21st Century, and that neither the Prophets, Jesus, or Apostles
asked people to follow blindly. Tuesday,
October 24 2006 | City
must pay a Christian dance troupe it discriminated against, train police in meaning
of First Amendment
| | Christian
Post: "The
city [Chula Vista, Calif.] has agreed to pay $31,000 to settle a lawsuit filed
by a pre-teen Christian dance troupe kicked out of the Holiday Festival last December
because of their religious message. Chula Vista also agreed to provide to police
officers and city officials annual First Amendment training 'with emphasis on
the rights of religious persons to express their faith in the public square.'
A hearing to approve the settlement is scheduled for Tuesday in U.S. District
Court in San Diego, though officials say the judge's approval is a formality.
Lita Ramirez, instructor for the Jesus Christ Dancers, said yesterday the outcome
of the case sends a message that religious expression must be protected. 'We did
this not just for us we did this for everybody,' Ramirez said." |
| The war
against Christmas resumes. Of course if there is a culture war between the second
largest religion in the world, secularism (atheism, materialism, with its most
fanatical denominations Communism, Fascism, and Darwinism) and the largest, Christianity,
it will resume every year about this time. And if there is no such war, both the
Christians and the secularists must be sleeping at the switch. Monday,
October 23 2006 | Editor
leaves town; a day offno update Sunday,
October 22 2006 | BBC
News celebrities admit they're biased against Christians, for multiculturalism
| | Daily
Mail, London: "A
leaked account of an 'impartiality summit' called by BBC chairman Michael Grade,
is certain to lead to a new row about the BBC and its reporting on key issues,
especially concerning Muslims and the war on terror. It reveals that executives
would let the Bible be thrown into a dustbin on a TV comedy show, but not the
Koran, and that they would broadcast an interview with Osama Bin Laden if given
the opportun-ity. Further, it discloses that the BBC's 'diversity tsar', wants
Muslim women newsreaders to be allowed to wear veils when on air. At the secret
meeting in London last month, which was hosted by veteran broadcaster Sue Lawley,
BBC executives admitted the corporation is dominated by homosexuals and people
from ethnic minorities, deliberately promotes multiculturalism, is anti-American,
anti-countryside and more sensitive to the feelings of Muslims than Christians." |
| Omigoodness...isn't
this where PBS gets all its ideas (and half its programs)? Saturday,
October 21 2006 | Cal
Thomas discovers that, after decades of life as a white married man, he's now
in a minority
| | Via
the Washington Times: "Part
of the devolution of marriage to minority status is the media's fault. Look at
who they feature on magazine covers, tabloid TV and awards shows: the cohabiting
without benefit of clergy, same-sex 'couples,' fornicating couples who flaunt
their 'lifestyles' and dare anyone to tell them to stop. The sexually transmitted
diseases that come from these 'lifestyles' are not the fault of those who engage
in the sort of behavior that puts them at risk. Rather, Republicans are to blame
for spending too little on 'cures' so the promiscuous can continue practicing
their 'lifestyles' without fear of disease. TV commercials for drugs that treat
genital herpes now run close to erectile dysfunction ads without irony. This decline
into minority status for people like me is also partly the fault of people like
me." | |
Though I often disagree with Cal Thomas's take on
social developments, this time he is spot on, again and again. Friday,
October 20 2006 | Fascist
'Brown Shirts' are multiplying in the Western world, and they don't come from
the right
| | Selwyn
Duke in Alain's Newsletter: "Brownshirts
do lurk among us. And, ominously, as they continue to metastasize, voices of truth
become fewer and fainter. But there are Americans who fancy themselves to be liberals
who cannot be counted among them, individuals who still think this is the age
of their grandfather’s liberalism. And for these people, I’ll present some points
to ponder. Doesn’t it give you pause for thought that fascist methods are ever
more frequently employed in our time, and that when they are it is virtually always
in the service of a leftist agenda? Then, a definition of liberalism from Dictionary.com
states: “favoring or permitting freedom of action, esp. with respect to matters
of personal belief or expression . . . ” So I ask you, don’t you think that perhaps,
just maybe, there’s something wrong with the soul of today’s liberalism when it
has become so illiberal?" | |
Though Duke's examples
are generally extremist leftists, I am convinced and have been saying for several
years (at least) that the worldview of the "moderate left," the liberal
educational establishment most pointedly, fosters Bown Shirt reactions in the
name of what its practitioners believe is "righteous indignation." Only
one "public school" system is allowed in almost all areas of the United
States, despite the existence of many different philosophies of education and
the relationship between children and society and families. But
vouchers, the obvious corrective of this fascist state of education, is opposed
just as irrationally by "liberal educators" as creation science and
intelligent design are opposed by the liberal "scientific" establishment
which is nothing if not intolerant of any views other than their own. Of course
Hitler's entire experiment was a creation of the top "scientific minds"
of that most enlightened era of the Twentieth Century. I use quote marks to mean
"so-called," of course, because these fascist useful idiots are anything
but liberal and anything but educators, even if they have taken control of the
American school system of lower education. Thursday,
October 19 2006 | Rich
Lowry: 'Theo-panic' equals emotional, self-righteous, and close-minded politics
| | In
National Review Online: "The
theocracy charge relies mainly on blowing Christian conservative positions out
of proportion. Do Christian conservatives oppose the public funding of embryo-destructive
stem-cell research? Well, then, Calvin’s Geneva can’t be far behind. Never mind
that in opposing such funding, they are usually supporting the status quo. It’s
a little like saying that because Democrats oppose cuts in Medicaid, they favor
a dictatorship of the proletariat. Purveyors of the theo-panic love to exaggerate
the influence of the bizarre Christian Reconstructionists who actually want an
American theocracy. As New York Times religion writer Peter Steinfels notes in
a review of the spate of new books, Christian Reconstructionists play 'a greater
role in the writings of the religious right’s critics than they ever have in the
wider evangelical world.' He notes that the flagship evangelical journal, Christianity
Today, almost never shows up in these books, because, inconveniently, it is 'moderate,
reflective and self-questioning.'" | |
Cromwell introduced
the first meaningfully representative parliament to England (though I certainly
allow that he was too harsh, especially against Irish Catholics), and Calvinism
is generally recognized as being the precursor and philosophical ground of the
American republican democracy, so I cringe just a little at the suggestion that
either was ever theocratic. But Lowry is generally a good thinker and he makes
many good points here. My favorite: National Review
senior editor Ramesh Ponnuru has pointed out that you can take all Christian conservative
positions — including far-fetched ones like banning sodomy and contraception —
and if they happened overnight they “would merely turn the clock back to the late
1950s. That may be a very bad idea, but the America of the 1950s was not a theocracy.”
Wednesday,
October 18 2006 | Forbes:
Americans are better off than ever, but still not satisfied, still griping
| | Tom
Van Riper: "Mr.
and Mrs. Median's $46,326 in annual income is 32% more than their mid-'60s counterparts,
even when adjusted for inflation, and 13% more than those at the median in the
economic boom year of 1985. And thanks to ballooning real estate values, median
house-hold net worth has increased even faster. The typical American household
has a net worth of $465,970, up 83% from 1965, 60% from 1985 and 35% from 1995.
Throw in the low inflation of the past 20 years, a deregulated airline industry
that's made travel much cheaper, plus technological progress that's provided the
middle class with not only better cars and televisions, but every gadget from
DVD players to iPods, all at lower and lower prices, and it's obvious that Mr.
and Mrs. Median are living the life of Riley compared to their parents and grandparents.
So why are they so unhappy?" | |
Van Riper doesn't
go into underlying causes of whining and dissatisfaction, like greed. Or the fact
that politicians and the advertising and marketing industries exploit people's
greed to change votes and spending priorities. See Forbes' related editorial
comment: The
American Standard of Whining. Tuesday,
October 17 2006 | Credible
Christian characters beginning to appear in network TV prime time
| | Jill
Vejnoska via Cox News Service: "'It's
a good sign, in that it represents more of America,' says Martha Zoller , a frequent
commentator on CNN, Fox News and the 'Today' show. 'Television has finally heard
from people like me, people who drive their kids to school and like to see themselves
portrayed.' People like the good folks of Dillon, Texas, on NBC's 'Friday Night
Lights.' Modern reality and traditional values go hand in hand in this drama about
a football-mad small city whose high school players move fluidly between watching
the latest ESPN highlights on their plasma screen televisions and urging each
other on with cries of 'Let's touch God, boys,' before games. 'In Texas, religion
isn't a big deal," executive producer Peter Berg says about not shying away from
showing characters attending church or praying for an injured player. "It's just
something that is.' And not just in Texas. 'Hollywood has recognized that there's
a gigantic part of the population that goes to church each week,' says Theodore
Baehr, chairman of the Christian Film & Television Commission, which has an office
based in Atlanta." | |
Though far from "football mad,"
I have long recognized its high school version as one of the most vital ingredients
in smalltown life in Western Pennsylvania, as well as Texas and some other states.
So I've been following Friday Night Lights with optimism and, thus far,
satisfaction. I hope it survives, deepens, and widens its reach. Monday,
October 16 2006 | $100,000
movie made by a 'guy who can't write, can't direct, can't edit and can't act'
grosses $3 million, thus far
| | Terry
Mattingly: "It helps,
however, to understand that the Southern Baptist guy at the heart of this movie
has had a tough time turning his 'Star Wars' epiphany into a career reality. He
is learning how to make movies and 'Facing the Giants' is only his second try.
Kendrick never had a real chance to study screenwriting, editing, directing or
acting. When the time came to pick a career, he did what many young media-driven
believers end up doing. He entered the ministry. It's hard to explain to outsiders
how this kind of thing happens. 'I kept trying to find people who felt the same
way as I did,' he said in an interview just before a ratings tussle with the Motion
Picture Association of America that sparked a media firestorm. 'I could see that
movies were shaping our culture and I couldn't understand why so many other people
couldn't see that. It was hard to find people who understood what I wanted to
do.'" | |
Could you say this is learning how to make movies
the old-fashioned way? Sunday,
October 15 2006 | Thousands
of lower-caste Hindus convert to Buddhism and Christianity over new laws forbidding
conversions
| | ninemsn:
"Thousands of low-caste
Hindus converted to Buddhism and Christianity in protest against new laws in several
Indian states that make such changes of religion difficult. The ceremonies took
place in the central city of Nagpur to coincide with the 50th anniversary of the
conversion to Buddhism of Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, a low-caste Hindu and the founder
of India's democratic constitution. Buddhist monks in orange robes and Christian
priests administered religious vows in separate ceremonies to about 10,000 Dalits,
the politically correct name for those called 'untouch-ables' in the past." |
| Some say
Dalits are predisposed to leave Hinduism because of its caste system, which many
would say demeans and dehumanizes them. Saturday,
October 14 2006 | Voting
for Republicans could delay the second coming of Christ, preacher claims
| | Becky
Gaylord in the Cleveland Plain Dealer: "Voters should oust congressional
Republican leaders because U.S. foreign policy is delaying the second coming of
Jesus Christ, according to a evangelical preacher trying to influence closely
contested political races. K.A. Paul railed against the war in Iraq on Sunday
before a crowd of 1,000 at the New Spirit Revival Center in Cleveland Heights,
his first stop on what he hopes is a 30-city campaign." |
| At least
it's original. Ted Olsen, the Christianity Today blogger, used the term
"nut job" in regard to this one. Friday,
October 13 2006 | Journalist
sees acceptance of gay marriage as a 'train wreck coming' to derail religious
freedom
| | David
Aikman in Christianity Today: "In the front line of this assault are
not churches or synagogues, but schools and college fellowship groups. In San
Francisco in April, a federal district court judge upheld the right of the University
of California's Hastings School of Law to deny campus recogni-tion of the Christian
Legal Society because of the society's requirement that members abstain from gay
sex. In August, the University of Wiscon-sin's Superior campus denied recognition
of InterVarsity Christian Fellow-ship for similar reasons. The issue has gone
far beyond the freedom of homosexuals to live and act openly; the issue is now
the freedom of religious people and organizations to criticize that lifestyle." |
| Though
the basic point is not new, the incidents are multiplying and showing no signs
of reversing the trend. Thursday,
October 12 2006 | Philosopher
Wolterstorff: prohibition of teaching creation proves states are not neutral toward
religion
| | W&M
News: "'There are people in present-day American society who hold to a literal
interpretation of Genesis, and the teaching of evolutionary theory in our public
schools is not neutral with respect to their religion,' he said. 'It may be that
their religion is not reasonable, though I think it is going to be very difficult
to make that case, but the neutrality required of a liberal democracy is not in
respect to the reasonable religions within our society but neutrality with respect
to the religions in our society.' "[Nicholas]
Wolterstorff [the Noah Porter Professor of Philosophical Theology Emeritus at
Yale University] proposed three options for teaching science in public schools.
One would be to allow 'public schools to teach as the whole truth of the matter
the sciences of nature as we find them in the contemporary world,' which would
violate the principle of neutrality. A second way would be to have standard science
taught while incorporating religious objections. 'Of course, instructing the public
schools to teach science along the generous ecumenical lines would stir up a hornet’s
nest of controversy within the scientific community,' he said. The third way,
which was favored by Wolterstorff—although he realized 'there is not a ghost of
a chance that it will come about'—would be for the government to fund equally
all schools that meet appropriate educational standards. 'The public schools enjoy
a monopoly on state funding,' he explained. 'Some schools teach creation science,
but the fact that such schools forego state funding implies that the state is
not neutral with respect to the religion of such parents.'" |
| Wolterstorff
has been one of my favorite philosophers since I first was introduced to him (through
writings) two or three decades ago. I'm going to say little this time to encourage
you to spend more time on the linked article. Wednesday,
October 11 2006 | Oxford
prof Richard Dawkins writes and speaks up for his religion: atheism
| | In
the Birmingham (U.K.) Post: "'Europeans need to know that there is
a travelling theo-freak show which actually advocates reinstatement of Old Testament
law - killing of homosexuals, etc - and the right to hold office, or even to vote
for Christians only. Middle class crowds cheer to this rhetoric. If secularists
are not vigilant, Dominionists and Reconstructionists will soon be mainstream
in a true American theocracy.'" | |
Anyone who believes
in the scientific method should be able to recognize the importance of accuracy
and avoiding untruth. The excerpt above is so far from the truth that it's laughable,
to anyone knowledgable about American Christianity. And if the U.K. were serious
about disallowing hate speech, Dawkins would be jailed. (I do not advocate laws
abrogating anyone's freedom of speech, as anyone paying attention here for a while
knows. Just saying, "if"....) I challenge Mr.
Richard Dawkins to produce a single political organization or a single candidate
for election in the United States, in the past generation, who fits this "theo-freak"
description that the esteemed Oxford zoologist has so cleverly created with help
from the media of the U.S. Loony Left. Who is advocating Old Testament law for
today's societies? Who is advocating theocracy? Who advocates limiting voting
rights and office holding to Christians? Who advocates persecuting, much less
killing, homosexuals? No one I've encountered in my 40-plus years of moving in
the circles of conservative American Christendom. Tuesday,
October 10 2006 | Gay
activists accused of hiding Mark Foley revelations for maximal impact on midterm
elections
| | Traditional
Values Coalition: "The exposure of Foley as a closeted homosexual and his
fantasies about young boys, was timed to do maxi-mum damage to the Republican
Party just weeks before the November election. WorldNetDaily reports that Mike
Rogers was involved in hiding information about Foley until it would do maximum
damage. Writing in a blog in March 2005, Rogers bragged: 'Mark Foley will be exposed
for the hypocrite he is through a mail and internet campaign that will reach into
every home in his district.' Rogers also bragged more recently that he was working
with officials at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Commit-tee and that 'the
good news is that the Democratic Congressional Cam-paign Committee is finally
getting it.' In another post, Rogers admitted that he had possessed copies of
Foley’s emails and that he was providing background information to various media
outlets. Said Rogers: 'Was (I) the central figure in reporting on Foley’s latest
scandal? Never said I was. Was my work on the case important to helping make sure
it came out before the election? Yes.'" |
| One need
pay only scant attention to the double standard of Democrats accusing Republicans
of "scandalous behavior" in the Foley case, which thus far has not even
found a charge of actual physical contact between Foley and any of his "victims,"
to see through the smokecreen to the real purpose of all the buzz. Foley was stupid,
immoral, immature, and wrong, but it is not apparent that anything he did was
illegal or that any of the pages receiving his attentions were anything other
than amused. But if this is all they have, the Dems and their media cohort will
play it for every vote (or every abstention from voting) it can be worth. Monday,
October 9 2006 | New
York Times examines evangelical fears of an exodus of today's teenagers
from the churches
| | Laurie
Goodstein: "At an unusual series of leadership meetings in 44 cities this
fall, more than 6,000 pastors are hearing dire forecasts from some of the biggest
names in the conservative evangelical movement. Their alarm has been stoked by
a highly suspect claim that if current trends continue, only 4 percent of teenagers
will be 'Bible-believing Christians' as adults — a sharp decline compared with
35 percent of the current generation of baby boomers, and before that, 65 percent
of the World War II generation. While some critics say that the statistics are
grossly exaggerated (one evangelical magazine for youth ministers dubbed it 'the
4 percent panic attack'), there is widespread consensus among evangelical leaders
that they risk losing their teenagers. 'I’m looking at the data,' said Ron Luce,
who organized the summit meetings and founded Teen Mania, a 20-year-old youth
ministry, 'and we’ve become post-Christian America, like post-Christian Europe.
We’ve been working as hard as we know how to work—everyone in youth ministry is
working hard — but we’re losing.' The board of the National Association of Evangelicals,
an umbrella group representing 60 denominations and dozens of ministries, passed
a resolution this year deploring 'the epidemic of young people leaving the evangelical
church.' Among the leaders speaking at the meetings are Ted Haggard, president
of the National Association; the Rev. Jerry Falwell; and nationally known preachers
like Jack Hayford and Tommy Barnett." |
| As went
Britney Spears, so go the rest of the evangelical youth? There
does seem reason to fear that Christianity's position as the dominant minority
in American society may be short lived, as it has ended in the past generation
in virtually all of Europe. Possibly the only hope of this not coming true is
in another revival similar to the Jesus movement of the 1970s. But I'm not convinced
that's going to happen. Sunday,
October 8 2006 | New
signs indicate that Northern Ireland firebrand Ian Paisley may be mellowing
| | AP's
Shawn Pogatchnik via Forbes: "The last time Ian Paisley sought to make
an impression on a Roman Catholic Church leader, the Protestant firebrand shouted
at the pope: 'I renounce you as the antichrist!' Paisley, like Northern Ireland
itself, seems to be mellowing with age. On Monday, the Democratic Unionist Party
leader famous for his anti-Catholic inflexibility plans to shake hands and chat
for the first time with Archbishop Sean Brady, leader of Ireland's 4 million Catholics.
Their encounter Monday in Belfast is being billed as a warm-up for Paisley's potential
rapprochement with his archenemy, Gerry Adams, the leader of Sinn Fein. Negotiations
will start Wednesday in Scotland which could include face-to-face talks between
the two for the first time. If they can reach the deal that both say is within
sight, their parties could be sharing a Cabinet table within weeks and running
Northern Ireland in place of Britain." |
| The American
Presbyterian denomination in which I was ordained 37 years ago had fellowship
with Northern Ireland's Free Presbyterians, so Ian Paisley occasionally visited
for conferences. I met him once and even discussed whether I'd be interested in
going to Belfast to be an editor for his paper. Though fascinated by Ireland and
never having visited, I declined. Though fiercely "Protestant" at that
time (I couldn't even consider dating a Catholic girl, for example), I could not
share his anti-Catholic views, which were more appropriate to the 16th Century
(when Martin Luther also called the Pope the antichrist) than the 20th. Saturday,
October 7 2006 | Book
review: Great commission vs. cultural mandate; must Christians choose?
| | James
K. A. Smith in Christianity Today: "Like a pendulum swinging from one
extreme to another, evangelicals have swung from a kind of pietistic stance of
withdrawal and suspicion to a strident, triumphalistic program for 'taking America
back for God.' The Myth of a Christian Nation, a new book by St. Paul pastor
and former professor at Bethel College Greg Boyd, provides a sign that the pendulum
might be headed back the other way. But first we need to first appreciate the
story thus far. Once upon a time, evangelicals considered the Great Commission
their primary mission and calling. What mattered was eternity. What was most urgent
was the salvation of souls. While evangelistic work was often attended by charity
and acts of mercy, few evangelicals could justify expending energy on 'worldly'
tasks such as politics. In the early 1970s, some influential voices began to argue
that this understanding of the church's calling was truncated." |
| This is
an age old, or at least a century old, tension in the conservative Christian movement.
In my youth 40 years ago, in editorial work with fundamental Presbyterian minister
Carl McIntire, even though he and the other leaders were outspoken in political
issues, they were adamantly against the younger generation's fondness for the
"cultural mandate," fearing that such concerns would eclipse their top
priority, "soul winning." In Holland a half century before that, the
same tension caused controversy among followers of the founder of the Christian
Democratic movement and Holland's reformed renewal, Abraham Kuyper. Friday,
October 6 2006 | Michael
Medved exposes the madness and paranoia behind current flood of anti-Christian
books
| | In
Alain's Newsletter: "This hugely expensive book promotion (such a prominently
placed full page in the New York Times often costs more than $100,000)
goes out of its way to assault and insult people of faith, drawing a clear dividing
line between the 'rational Americans' it hopes to reach and the benighted masses
who believe in God, the importance of religious be-lief, or even the existence
of hell. You might expect this sort of partisan, opinionated declaration of non-faith
from some activist group like 'Move On.org' or 'People for the American Way' or
even the American Civil Liberties Union. But the ad came from Alfred A. Knopf,
one of the world’s most distinguished publishing imprints and a prominent segment
of the mighty Random House empire, which also releases the work of prominent conservatives
including (through its Crown Forum division) Ann Coulter, Fred Barnes and me." |
| The vagaries
of the publishing world dictate that when a topic is hot, every publisher has
to have a piece of the action it produces. This is not the first time Xnmp has
looked at some of the books Medved describes; all of them I've looked at are based
on false premises and lack support for their wild theories of the dangers of theocracy
coming to America.... Thursday,
October 5 2006 | Maryland
school sued for prohibiting student reading of the Bible during her break
| | CNSNews.com:
"The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland against
Dwight D. Eisenhower Middle School. Eighth grade Vice Principal Jeannette Rainey
and Principal Charoscar Coleman are among the defendants in the suit. According
to the student's mother, Maryanne Mangum, Amber was reading her Bible after finishing
her lunch when Rainey gave her a 'verbal warning' to put the Bible away. Amber
was told she 'was not allowed to read it, and if it happened again,' Amber would
be punished, her mother said. 'She didn't take the Bible back to school.'" |
| Just another
example among thousands of "tolerance" and conformity to the U.S. Constitution
(remember the First Amendment, anyone?) as modeled by the nation's so-called educators. Wednesday,
October 4 2006 | Andrew
Sullivan's book, The Conservative Soul, called 'a canonization of subjectivity'
| | Mark
Gauvreau Judge, in Christianity Today: "The true conservative's only
guide, posits Sullivan, is his conscience. The conscience is protean and, in Sullivan's
case, prone to New Age bromides: 'As humans, we can merely sense the existence
of a higher truth, a greater coherence than ourselves; but we cannot see it face
to face.' According to Sullivan, 'We see the world from where we are, and our
understanding of the universe is intrinsically rooted in time and place. We can
do all we can to increase our knowledge and gain deeper and deeper insight. We
can read history and philosophy; we can travel; we can ask questions of young
and old; we can debate; we can pray; we can grow through the pain and amusement
of daily life. But we will never fully or completely transcend where we are. And
even if we could, such transcendence would render us unintelligible to those still
earthbound.'...Has Sullivan ever heard of the saints, who some Catholics still
believe are intercessors whose message is intelligible? The Virgin Mary? Not to
mention Jesus Christ, who one or two Christians believe is truth itself and who
was seen face to face?" | |
Ironically it was an answer
to a liberal minister's Easter homily extolling doubt (rather than faith) as the
Easter sermon chosen for publication in Newsday in April that led me to
the following passage by Pope Benedict XVI when he was still Cardinal Ratzinger,
which exposes the lie in so-called conservative writer Andrew Sullivan's anti-church
manifesto. Wrote Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger in 1960: both
the believer and the unbeliever share, each in his own way, doubt and belief,
if they do not hide from themselves and from the truth of their being. Neither
can quite escape either doubt or belief; for the one, faith is present against
doubt; for the other, through doubt and in the form of doubt. It is the basic
pattern of man's destiny only to be allowed to find the finality of his existence
in this unceasing rivalry between doubt and belief, temptation and certainty.
Tuesday,
October 3 2006 | Christian
women on today's campuses are the new counter-culture revolutionaries
| | Terry
Mattingly, On Religion: "'There is a mini-revolt going on out there and you'll
find it in the Christian groups that you find on most campuses,' said Barbara
Dafoe Whitehead, co-director of the National Marriage Project at Rutgers University.
'The students in these independent religious groups especially the girlsare
the new countercultural revolutionaries at our modern secular universities.' That's
the good news. The bad news is that if alternative religious groups didn't exist
on most campuses, then these young women would have 'nowhere else to go if they
are looking for the kind of moral support that they need to find some way around
the "let's get drunk and hook up" scene,' she said. Secular and religious
researchers have tried to describe the causes and the effects of this alcohol-fueled
sexual mayhem on mainstream campuses." |
| The "sex,
drugs, and rock and roll" chickens hatched over the past five decades have
come home to roost. My take is that the same scenario is widely played out on
the high school campuses (or, among the student bodies, off campus). Monday,
October 2 2006 | Southern
Baptist Press cries foul on New York Times Pulitzer-winning feminist
| | "'Linda
Greenhouse has, as this [NPR] story points out, a long history of using her platform
as a journalist to promote her political and ideological agenda,' Focus on the
Family's Carrie Gordon Earll, who worked as a television reporter for 10 years,
told Baptist Press. 'She really gives a bad name to reporters.' Christians and
pro-lifers should take Greenhouse's reporting 'with a grain of salt,' Earll said.
'Greenhouse's misuse of her profession -- and others who do that also -- created
the environment in which alternative media, like Baptist Press, Focus on the Family
and conservative talk radio, have flourished,' Earll said. '... If Greenhouse
wants to be an advocate, great, but let's put her on the editorial page and not
the news page.'" | |
Though I love this expose from
the SB Press, I disagree with the concluding thought from the excerpt above. Is
that attitude just advocating more deception? "Veil your opinions so the readers
will think the Times is a neutral or fair and balanced medium?" It has
never been that and never will be, and the more display there is of unbalance
in the actual reporting, the more potential readers will avoid its biases and
find places that don't denigrate their religion or blaspheme their God to get
their news. Sunday,
October 1 2006 | Top
Eastern Orthodox hierarch says adding Turkey to European Union could solve Christian
problems Pope's
visit to Turkey presents opportunities, risks, challenges
| | Assyrian
International News Agency: "Orthodox Patriarch Bartholo-meos said late Thursday
that Turkey's request to become a member of the European Union will make the problems
of Christians disappear 'one after another.' Bartholomeos made the remarks to
a group of Vatican-based journalists in Istanbul ahead of the crucial visit of
Pope Benedict XVI to Turkey, set for late November. 'Europe is asking our government
to respect principles and rights, which is something that a democratic lay government
should do,' he said. Stressing that the pope is awaited in Turkey with joy and
love, the Orthodox patriarch said he expects Benedict to raise the issue of religious
rights when he visits Istanbul. 'The pope always under-lines the principles of
religious freedom and human rights ... which are valid principles for democratic
societies. So I think the pope in his sermon here will speak not only in favor
of Catholics but in favor of all religious minorities,' he said." |
| The article
isn't probing enough to unpack the statement that led to the Xnmp heading, but
it seems that without wanting to seem confrontational, the Patriarch (the "ecumenical
patriarch" of Orthodoxy, or the archbishop that all other Orthodox jurisdictions
turn to to schedule deliberative meetings, thus making him "ranking"
or top in honor in the Eastern church) is challenging the position the Vatican
has set forth on membership in the European Union for Turkey. Pope John Paul II
opposed Turkey's admission, saying it would upset the Christian history of Europe,
and presumably Pope Benedict XVI also holds a similar view. No
doubt Bartholomew is playing politics with a very, very delicate situation between
the Pope, Islam, and his own see, which is in Istanbul, Turkey's major city and
for a thousand years (as Constantinople before its fall to the Ottomans) the center
of Orthodox Christianity. |